The number of people living in different levels across the world is pyramidal. There are a large number of numbers on the elementary level, but as they progress, the numbers fall and leave only a few in higher education. In the United States, about 65 million students took part from K to K12 in the fall of 2015. Over the same period, 20.2 million people are expected to attend dormitories and universities. It is estimated that 25% of the fresh secondary schools in the United States can not finish. For fresh students who give dormitories or universities from 1 to 3, they probably will not do this in the second year. This drop-out rate hinders national development, as many do not get the full training they need to be able to work in society. National development would be greatly facilitated by the fact that more adults receive education in order to become functional in society.
I'm not saying that any adult who is not fully trained does not play an important role in society. There are very prominent individuals in society who have resigned at some level from school. Bill Gate, Mark Zuckerberg, Oprah Winfrey, for some time, disappeared from school. Although this list is not exhaustive, it is out of school or has decided not to reach higher education, and yet it has succeeded, it is relatively small. The majority who stopped or stopped teaching and did not succeed in their careers was because they lack the knowledge they need to develop their potential. If we look at the history of those who would have succeeded in dropping out or dropping out of school, they would find that they seemed to have found the purpose of life and so sought to do so, and more importantly, they later received some education. 19659002] Education, as we know, is lifelong. At any point in time, either stepping out of school or staying up to maturity, you would need education. School dropout, which can be attributed to a job or job search in education to make it more productive, drop-out who recognized the need for a school, but "increased school age" and school desirability obviously needs education, managers and employees for further education are needed in order to keep up with today's rapidly changing world and increase wages and status. Somehow, the traditional education-based society that we have created for ourselves and the "best", limits our pursuit of continuing education. For many people, formal education ended when they dropped out of high school, university, or university, although technology allows us to sit in our homes and still get quality education.
When technology – Internet connectivity – replaced physical classrooms and enabled distance learning in real time, it seemed that issues relating to continuing education for everyone, including drop-outs, and the working class, were solved. It seemed and still so, that now the teacher does not have to leave his students, but must seek study leave or absence for further education. It seemed that a fifty-year-old woman who had left school a few years ago could go home from school today and it seemed that her father knew what her daughter was doing in the dormitory using the same tool. That's what I saw. Those who have resigned from school because of financial affairs and since they have not had a breakthrough, do not benefit, and those whose money does not want to monetize employers and academics will be flaunting in the same way. It seems that these two groups have changed slightly, though online colleges and universities are abundant.
Two primary questions are wrong. First, online education is too expensive for the target audience of the students and, secondly, the perception that online colleges and universities do not provide holistic education such as traditional colleges and universities. As noted by Ed Vosganian, the founder and CEO of College Funding 123, the cost of college campus is estimated at $ 42,000 and $ 21,000 for online universities within the same group. By comparison, you could say that you spend far less on learning on the Internet. But you should not ignore those who are most likely to come to the online university. Those middle and lower classes who choose online universities. They include; the worker who has sacrificed the pleasure of higher qualification in return for better wages, the unemployed who are capable of acquiring skills, the drop-out who wants to return to school hoping to have a brighter future and a far-away part of the world, especially in the developing world, who does not even pay their money for prizes, so they need to learn and work together. The $ 21,000 of these dollars is so enormous that it is very difficult to lift. Some people have a higher income class at online universities, but online learning is not popular because of low prestige and online education myths. Online institutions tell you that they do nothing on their certificate to prove that they have not received a traditional education. This ad is about how society evaluates online education. On-line education is a cheap way of getting "irrigated" education. Online colleges and universities have until recently been graduate. This concept still exists, although empirical evidence suggests that there is no difference in the quality of students between traditional colleges and universities and online colleges and universities. Online colleges and universities can do all they can to make online learning more valuable and less expensive, but they can not do it alone. With state intervention, online learning can be prestigious, lower and middle class.
The government must provide a national framework for online education, support accreditation and provide scholarships and student loans to online colleges and universities. The national framework governing the operation of all online colleges and universities should be initiated by the state through the Ministry of Education or the competent governmental body. This descriptive and inherently non-descriptive framework would describe, for example, the minimum courses to be taken at the given level, and the general operating mode of online universities and colleges, without specifying specific courses or modes of operation. Accreditation is not only a hassle for online colleges and universities; this is also expensive. This cost will be transferred to the students, eliminating program fees. If the government decides to absorb half of the cost of accreditation, although there is no guarantee that program fees will drop by half, the program fee will be reduced somewhat. Finally, most of the students who choose online colleges and universities do not receive scholarships and student loans from the state. Those who get something, do not get huge scholarships and student loans, like traditional colleges and universities peers. The government must provide scholarships and student loans for online colleges and students, as well as for students from conventional colleges and universities.
The consequences of these interventions would definitely be frightening. The organization of national frameworks for online education eliminates false negative perceptions of online learning people. Many people think that online learning is easy and the number of credits received is much lower than in the traditional learning environment. This thinking exists because there are badly designed online courses where the certificate is submitted only after some tasks. These exercises can be set when a national framework is being developed and operated. The national framework gives credibility to online learning, because the online national standard must be respected so no online college or university can only sell a certificate. Support for accreditation results in three results. Most obviously, it would reduce program fees because less students would be less. Encouraging accreditation fees would encourage online colleges and universities to accredit them by the Ministry of Education recognized by accreditation bodies or by the appropriate state agency. Although accreditation is not mandatory in some parts of the world, such as in the United States, some occupations requiring state licensing do not accept the diplomas of non-accredited colleges and universities. Potential online students are usually worried about being able to work with certifications easily. Government intervention eliminates this concern and eliminates negative perception of online education. Government interventions in the form of scholarships and loans would facilitate financial burdens and allow those who have not yet been able to attend school. In sum, state intervention could reach a long way to enlighten the enlightened society, as it allows many people to participate in higher education.
Many people like to acquire higher education through online colleges and universities to acquire knowledge and skills, knowledge and skills, but they can not afford either the cost or the uncertainty of the certificate's admissibility. State intervention in online national universities and colleges, support for accreditation costs, scholarships and student loans will open the door for those who want to learn from home. Government intervention can ensure that online learning is as good as traditional college or university education and that they receive their certificate for public positions that require a state license. This would ease pressure on the facilities of traditional colleges and universities, produce well-educated citizenship for national development, and transform the current pyramid shape into "close" rolls. The real price of online college. from http://www.affordablecollegesonline.org/financial-aid/online-college-degree-cost/