Educational institutions that are part of it face challenges never encountered in society that have an impact on these institutions and communities of pupils and educators. These include strong demographic changes, reductions in provincial budgets, revolutionary forecasting of information and telecommunications technologies, globalization, competing with new educational providers, market pressures to shape educational and academic practices towards profit-oriented goals, and the growing demands and pressures in public policy and public accountability regarding the role of higher education in addressing the pressing societies and society's urgent questions. All of these challenges would be significant in themselves, but together they will increase the complexity and difficulty of education in maintaining or promoting the core work of the public good.
Through an educational forum, we agree that: the link between higher education and society requires a wide-ranging effort that involves the whole of education, not just individual institutions, departments and associations.
The detailed solutions just go so far; strategies for change should be shared with common ideas and common objectives. The "movement" approach of change is a major promise of transforming the university culture as the dominant "organizational" approach.
The mobilization of change requires strategic alliances, networks and partnerships with a wide range of stakeholders within and beyond education
The Joint Action Plan is specifically designed to support the "move" approach to change by encouraging the formation of a strategic alliance with individuals and organizations that promote the role of higher education in promoting the ideas of a diverse democratic system of education practices, relationships and services
A common agenda
The common agenda aims to create a "living" document and an open process for collective action and guides the management of learning between committed and committed partners within and outside of higher education. As a living document, the Common Agenda is a collection of focused activities designed to promote social, social and cultural roles in society. This jointly created, implemented and focused Common Agenda respects the diversity of activities and programs of individuals, institutions and networks and acknowledges the common interests of the whole. As an open process, the common agenda is a common structure of work-to-relationships linkages that focuses on the scientific role played by society. Different Methods of Allocating and Strengthening Joint Work Within and beyond Education within the Joint Action Process
This approach is understandably ambitious and unique in terms of its purpose and application. The Common Agenda is ultimately challenging the higher education system and those who consider education to be critical in dealing with pressing societal issues, with deliberate, collective and unambiguous, variable and significant commitments to society. At present, four general issues are at the heart of the common agenda: 1) building public understanding and supporting our civic missions and actions; 2) the cultivation of networks and partnerships; 3) Involving and strengthening civic responsibility in the culture of higher education institutions; and 4) Embedding Citizenship and Social Responsibility into the Education System Structure
TESTING There are ideas that promote and practice learning, scholarship and commitment to promote individual well-being, institutional responsiveness and integration and promote social health which respects state needs. Our universities are proactive and responsive to community, ethical and economic problems, and larger societies. Our students are people of integrity who embody diversity, are socially responsible and civilized in their lives.
MISSION The purpose of the common agenda is to provide a framework for the organization, management and communication of education values and practices civil, social and economic commitments to a diverse democratic system
In my opinion, social justice, ethics, Equity education and the social change of positive impacts are essential in the work of higher education. We believe that the relationship between communities and educational institutions is based on equality, respect and reciprocity, as well as on work in education, which is mutually dependent on other institutions and individuals in society.
We strive for extensive partnerships and rely on all kinds of institutions and committed individuals within and outside of higher education.
We recognize the interconnection of politics, power, and privilege. The common agenda is not about self-service of higher education, but attitude towards "conversation" as opposed to public goals. We consider the common agenda to be a dynamic live document and we expect that the activities it undertakes will change over time.
THE COMMON AGENCY FRAMEWORK The general context of the common agenda is shown below. It is obvious that while organizing and disposing of goals and items of action within certain topics, there are significant overlaps and complementarity between issues, goals and action items. Furthermore, after each batch of actions, there are the names of individuals who have committed themselves to serving "points individuals" for that item.
1. DIFFERENCE: MISSING AND ACTIVITIES
Public opinion is increasingly equivalent to higher education benefits by getting "good work" and "higher pay". In order to understand and support the full benefits of higher education, the leaders of public and higher education should conduct critical and honest discussions on the social role of higher education. Purpose: To develop a common language that resonates inside and outside the institution. Activity Elements: Develop a common language and themes about our university role and responsibility towards public goods through discussions with the wider public.
Collect the scholarships on public goods, explore topics, and identify the remaining issues. Developing national awareness of higher education's importance for public interest through the development of marketing efforts
Purpose: To promote effective and wider discourse. Functional Items: Attracting Public Attitude to Institutional Diversity within and between higher education institutions
Identifying strategies to involve old-age associations for the deception of the public good and the construction of bridges between higher education and private and public sector companies. Develop the direction of discourse to improve the quality of dialogue at all levels of society.
2nd QUESTION: DEVELOPING NETWORKS AND PARTNERSHIPS
The approach to complex issues, such as the role of higher education in society, requires a wide range of partners to develop strategies and actions that involve more valuable perspectives and experiences.
Broad partnerships to strengthen the relationship between higher education and society allow strategic cooperation within and beyond higher education to achieve common goals for the common good. 19659002] Purpose: Creating Widespread and Scattered Communication Systems and Processes
Creating an Information and Resource Network between Higher Education Associations Creating Information Processes that promote appropriate conferences, present presenters and presentations at relevant national conferences. (19659002) Purpose: Creating and supporting strategic alliances and creating and supporting various co-operations
Activity Elements: Higher Education Associations and the External Community (such as NGOs, legislators, community members ) Understanding the public how to apply the role of art in promoting higher education for the common good Promoting cooperation between higher education and addressing access, retention and maturity issues
Q3: RENOVATING AND IMPROVING CIVIC VALUES RESPONSIBILITY IN CULTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS  Education must monitor the implicit and explicit implications of its work and examine "what counts" research, teaching and services of public interest (19659002) Lectures: Develop and implement a curriculum in colleges and universities that promote students' civic engagement Social Curriculum and Community Learning Outcomes in the Curriculum and Co-Curriculum
develop programs to develop leadership and civic engagement Create learning opportunities in and outside the classroom that promote freedom, democratic accountability, social justice and knowledge in the economic system Develop student leadership and service opportunities that focus on ethical attitudes Study Leaders organizing and networking skills, encourage student leadership and diversity education
Purpose: Deeper commitment to public goods
Operational Items: Work with communication skills and language colleagues to describe their relationship with the public and educate common prosperity models. Identify the models of promotional and occupancy norms. Models for Growth Growth
Purpose: Identify, recognize, and support stakeholder scholarships.
Operations: Identify and disseminate models and examples of state scholarships. Encouraging participation in Community research Assistance institutions draw attention to the exemplary approach.
Objective: To bring graduate education into civic mission
Activity Elements: To engage in dialogue with disciplinary associations to engage students in the engagement, involvement and service of the public The "civic engagement" of academic and professional sciences as defined in the field of "civic engagement" Involvement of the concept of higher education in public education in the current education reforms
4. KNOWLEDGE: CONCLUSION AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE STRUCTURE The promotion of the economic benefits of the higher education system requires efforts beyond the institutions to incorporate intentionally the values of civic engagement and social responsibility into governance practices, political decisions and educational processes
. Administrative Strategies
Articles: Developing student and community participation in the management and decision-making process of educational institutions. Identify and promote institutions that improve public participation and the practice of democracy in their institution.
Purpose: Identify and Promote Valuable Relationships Publicly
Operational Items: Provide a Public Service Provision that Stimulates Institutional Performance in Public Service and Outreach Activities
Provide a comprehensive source of funding resources, association activities, initiatives and exemplary practices that promote the common good. Learn, acknowledge and support early career scholars who decide to engage in public and higher education and public life.
Purpose: Evaluation and accreditation processes include civic engagement and corporate social responsibility
as a public good as a key element of provincial and federal education plans (eg master plans, provincial budgets and professional associations).
Higher education associations and legislators are united in the current definition of student outcomes and outcomes
Purpose: Maintaining stronger links between university, federal and provincial government
Developing strategy and processes for system-wide planning, accreditation and consideration of evaluation programs,.
Action lines: Develop a two-year implementation plan, which is the university rector / rector and director of provincial legislators to carry out an assessment of the need for publicity per province Contractor between curators and provincial legislators dialogue to discuss universities and public policy role of public goods at local, provincial and national level.